Hazem Naow vs Noah Thurner Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Aug at 03:38 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
H. Naow vs N. Thurner

SYR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

GER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Naow 1 - 0 Thurner
They have played 2 sets in total, with Hazem Naow winning 2 and Noah Thurner winning 0. The last match between Hazem Naow and Noah Thurner was at the M15 Allershausen, 27-08-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Hazem Naow getting the victory 6-0 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Naow | 1 |
| Thurner | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Allershausen(08-27-25)
H. Naow vs N. Thurner H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 63.31% (176-102) | Career Total W/L | 44.44% (104-130) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 4 | Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
H. Naow vs N. Thurner Match Preview:
- Recent second serve performance favors Thurner, who won 39.82% of points compared to Naow's 30.43%.
- Naow shows a stronger return game, winning 70.73% of opponent's second serve points, substantially higher than Thurner's 44.26%.
- On first serve returns, Naow has a slight edge, winning 35.94% compared to Thurner's 30.38%.
- In pressure situations, Thurner performs better, saving 53.5% of breakpoints, whereas Naow saves 40%.
- Recent overall match performance shows Thurner with a better win percentage of 52.54%, compared to Naow's 42.11%.
- Both players perform best on hard surfaces, with Naow's career win percentage at 69% and Thurner's at 46%.
- Naow mostly competes in Challengers/ITF events with a win percentage of 30.77%, while Thurner competes in Futures/Satellites events, achieving a 52.54% win rate.
- Thurner has faced slightly tougher competition, with opponents averaging a rank of 325.86 against Naow's 336.79.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Thurner has a clear advantage with a 29% win rate over Naow's 0% in the past year.
- Naow is effective at converting breakpoints, succeeding 44.44% of the time, slightly better than Thurner's conversion rate of 38.1%.
Editorial Prediction (August 27, 2025, UTC):
Analyzing both players’ recent performances provides a clear picture of their strengths and weaknesses. While Thurner excels on second serve points and under pressure, Naow has demonstrated a superior return game, especially against second serves.
In terms of overall match-winning ability, Thurner has shown better form over the past year, playing against slightly tougher opponents and in higher-tier events. His experience in high-pressure situations gives him an additional edge.
Considering the potential for the match to go to a deciding set, Thurner's ability to secure wins in such scenarios strengthens his position further.
Based on these analyses, Thurner is likely to emerge as the winner in this upcoming tennis match.
Hazem Naow vs Noah Thurner Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
H. Naow vs N. Thurner H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 5 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 8 | Total Double Faults | 8 |
| 1:50:46 | Average Match Time | 1:50:46 |
| 53% (36/68) | 1st Serve % | 53% (39/73) |
| 67% (24/36) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (23/39) |
| 47% (15/32) | 2nd Serve Win % | 29% (10/34) |
| 40% (6/15) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (2/8) |
| 55% (40/73) | Return Points Win % | 43% (29/68) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
H. Naow Recent Matches Played
N. Thurner Recent Matches Played

H. Naow vs N. Thurner Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 63.31% (176/102) | YTD Win/Loss | 44.44% (104/130) |
| 61.30% (388/245) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.67% (238/272) |
| 54.39% (3182/2668) | Games Win/Loss | 48.70% (2420/2549) |
| 68.42% (78/36) | Hard Win/Loss | 45.07% (32/39) |
| 57.94% (62/45) | Clay Win/Loss | 43.75% (56/72) |
| 63.16% (36/21) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45.71% (16/19) |
| 0.14 | Aces Per Game | 0.13 |
| 409 | Aces Total | 320 |
| 0.26 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.19 |
| 748 | Total Double Faults | 459 |
| 1:23:18 | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 414.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 229.85 |
| 67% (10190/15241) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4642/6886) |
| 65% (6599/10190) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3067/4642) |
| 47% (2389/5051) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (989/2244) |
| 46% (851/1865) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (257/604) |
| 44% (6841/15565) | Return Points Win % | 38% (2585/6766) |
| 50.00% (1/1) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.00% (0/1) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 50.85% (30/29) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 67.13% (145/71) | Futures W/L | 44.44% (104/130) |
| 63% (172/273) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 45% (104/232) |
| 100% (2/2) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 52% (32/62) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (33/69) |
| 51% (40/78) | Deciding Set Win % | 32% (14/44) |
| 89% (170/152) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 83% (117/97) |
| 11% (170/18) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 17% (117/20) |
| 22% (108/24) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (117/7) |